Making a #hash of things…yes, here we go

Last week, 350.org launched a twitterstorm to increase the profile of their campaign to end subsidies for fossil fuels. The storm was timed to coincide with the Rio+20 meetings. What’s a twitterstorm? A tempest of tweets, all with the same message, all sent at about the same time. The storm makes a tidal surge, hopefully breaching the dunes on the shores of the internet.

So what? Isn’t this less than a tempest in a teacup? After all, twitter is just thought, mere ether (miasma, some would say), with no physical substance; no tea, no cup. Perhaps. But the history of humanity (and the experience of our everyday lives) is surely a testament to the power of that ether to come to ground and change the world (how did that long-buried CO2 get burned up in the first place?). In the big scheme of things, one twitterstorm is a tiny gust, but the wind from this storm even pushed briefly into the normally airtight halls of power in DC.

The campaign’s launch persuaded me to sign up, dipping my toe (inexpertly, I’m sure) into the stream of @s, #s, RTs, and other obtuse ciphers of this clipped form of speech. I have a not-so-hidden agenda, a plan that has been brewing in various incoherent ways for a year now: to gather a cadre of naturalists to sing “nature” into the twitmosphere while digging deeper into the particularities of our places. The exact form of the idea is still composting, but some mature humus of thought will hopefully emerge soon. For now, I’m tweeting one natural history observation per day: a notable sighting, a sensory impression, or an interesting ecological interaction. With just 140 characters to play with, the right voice is not self-evident, so I’m goofing around. For now, I’m tweeting pretty much into the void, like praying to a non-existent god, or speaking a poem into air with no-one to hear. I’d be delighted to have this void populated by a few ears. So I invite you to take a look (you don’t have to be on Twitter to check it out) or to join me.

Unlike this blog, which I’ve tried to keep fairly clear of politics, I’m also retweeting a little information from ongoing environmental activist campaigns. In the very short time that I’ve been signed up, I’ve been pleasantly surprised at what a great tool Twitter is for keeping on top of what is happening in DC where, for better or worse, the fates of real storms in our atmosphere and biosphere are being decided.

I’m interested to see where, if anywhere, this little experiment goes. In my limited experience, the intersection between the sets (naturalists), (academics), and (twitter) is very, very small. My hunch is that this need not be the case: there is some creative potential to be played with in that space.

The usual critique of twitter, that it is just trivial chatter and therefore worthless, seems off the mark. Trivial chatter is part of our inheritance as ultra-social primates, a kind of linguistic grooming. Now that we don’t have fleas to pick off each other (or so I hope), social media fill the void. From ectoparasites to smartphones; our opposable thumbs come in handy once again.

4 thoughts on “Making a #hash of things…yes, here we go

  1. Country Mouse

    I really liked your phrase “digging deeper into the particularities of our places.” – That’s an idea I’m growing into – I live on 3 ridge top acres 6 miles inland from Santa Cruz, CA – redwoods, chaparral, mixed evergreen forest habitats all intersecting right here. It’s amazing. I’m picking up knowledge and skills as I go. Your TTBOOK interview was great – made me wonder: How can we be “citizen scientists,” doing (sort of) what you did? (My next step is to actually read your book!)

    Reply
    1. David George Haskell Post author

      Glad you liked the interview! You’re in a fascinating part of the world. The last part of the book has a few suggestions, but the main one is to lean into the remarkable community of life that we’re embedded in. Your blog makes clear that you’re doing exactly that. I hope you’ll enjoy reading the book.

      Reply
  2. Jim Markowich

    Country Mouse (and David) — In response to the question about citizen scientists — please consider taking a look at this: http://tinyurl.com/ct9q22e

    My wife and I met Loree serendiptiously in Mexico in 2009, when we were all in the midst of that particular experience of soul expansion known as visiting-the-overwintering-monarch-butterflies-in-the-mountains. Facebook keeps cementing our relationship. Her book is recommendable not only for its attention to the quiet secrets that nature imparts to those who look and listen with enthusiam, but also because it makes the smart decision that “those” can well be children.

    David — I just can’t do the Twitter thing. It’s just one digital diversion too many. But thank you for drumming up your own daily nature song on it. I hope its denizens hear and heed.

    Reply
    1. David George Haskell Post author

      Hi Jim,

      I will most definitely take a look — it seems like a great book with a very important message, especially as it relates to children.

      I hear your concern about digital diversions. For now I’m enjoying putting some nature out into Twitter, but I certainly understand Twitter is not to everyone’s taste. And it has the potential to add further digital mist between people and the world.

      Best wishes, David

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s